Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Kyoto Rich Hotel

Gojo-Agaru Kawaramachi-dori Shimogyo, Kyoto 600-8029, Japan
+81 753 411 131

€61+

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
based on 1,268 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.9
  • 8.6
  • 4.8
  • 4.7

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Central Kyoto, this hotel is within a 15-minute walk of Kyoto Tourist Information Center, Gion Corner, and Higashi Honganji Temple. Kiyomizu Temple and Sanjusangendo Temple are also within 1 mi (2 km).

    Less show all
    Expedia

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Laundry service
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Parking
    • Safe
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Laundry facilities
    • Pets not allowed
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,268 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      9.4 "Near to public transport, according to 94%."
      9.2 "Easily accessible by car, said 92%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."
      8.1 "81% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Internet is average."
    • 4.8 "Bad amenities."
      4.6 "54% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.0 "80% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.1 "69% complained about the elevator."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were dirty."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were small."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were dirty."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.2 "88% found problems with the furniture."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      3.3 "67% had problems with the shower."
      0.0 "100% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were small."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.0 "90% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 367 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 97%."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.4 "84% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Average amenities."
      5.0 "50% thought the building was acceptable."
    • 5.1 "Internet is average."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 355 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.4 "Near to public transport, according to 94%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.8 "Good value."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.6 "76% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Bad amenities."
      4.4 "56% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.7 "83% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      1.3 "87% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "87% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.9 "Horrible vibe."
      0.8 "92% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.2 Good
    based on 25 reviews
    • 7.4 "Good service."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 519 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."
      9.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 97%."
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.2 "82% thought the service was very professional."
      7.9 "79% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Bad amenities."
      4.6 "54% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.7 "83% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      1.2 "88% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "For 92%, the rooms looked old."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
      0.3 "97% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.2 "88% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      0.3 "97% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou
    Photos
    Map

    Map