Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Villa Lutece Port Royal

52 Rue Jenner, 75013 Paris, Île-de-France, France
+33 1 53 61 90 90

€57+

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
based on 659 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.6
  • 7.2
  • 4.0
  • 3.8

Nearby

    show all

    About

    This Paris hotel is in the up-and-coming Place d'Italie district, less than one kilometre from the new national library, the Jardin des Plantes, and Rue Mouffetard.

    Less More
    Expedia

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Parking (surcharge)
    • Internet
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • No smoking
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Room service
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 659 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.4 "84% said the reception staff was great."
      9.5 "95% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.1 "Vibe was decent."
    • 5.4 "Food is average."
    • 5.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      4.4 "56% complained about the bathroom."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      0.8 "For 92%, the rooms looked old."
      2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 94%."
      1.4 "86% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 1.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.4 "86% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 362 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.4 "84% said the reception staff was great."
      9.6 "96% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.7 "Vibe was decent."
    • 5.5 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.5 "Food is average."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were dirty."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      4.5 "55% complained about the bathroom."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      4.5 "55% had problems with the shower."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.8 "82% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 131 reviews
    • 8.0 "Location is great."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.2 "Average amenities."
      5.9 "59% thought the building was acceptable."
    • 6.1 "Average value."
    • 5.6 "Vibe was decent."
    • 5.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were small."
      2.7 "73% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 3.5 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      4.1 "59% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "73% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 1.4 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.1 "89% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 19 reviews
    • 7.3 "Good service."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      4.3 "57% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 144 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      8.4 "84% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.0 "Vibe was decent."
    • 5.7 "Average value."
    • 5.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.3 "57% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      2.1 "79% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      2.1 "79% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 1.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.5 "85% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close