Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Albergaria Residencial Insulana

Rua da Assuncao, 52, 1100 Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
+351 213 427 625

€41+

Overall guest ratings

7.5/10 Good
based on 1,300 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.7
  • 9.1
  • 3.1
  • 3.0

Good to know

  • Great reception

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located 4.7 mi (7.6 km) from the airport, Albergaria Residencial Insulana offers a great location, putting you within just a 10-minute walk of Santa Justa Elevator and Rossio Square. You can unwind with a drink at the bar/lounge, and free breakfast is available daily. Also, Castle of Sao Jorge and Lisbon Cathedral are within a short drive.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Bicycle hire
    • No smoking
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    based on 1,300 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.2 "Easily accessible by car, said 82%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 9.1 "World class service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.7 "87% said the reception staff was great."
      9.6 "96% thought the service was very professional."
      7.3 "Housekeeping was great, according to 73%."
    • 9.0 "Excellent value."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the price of the breakfast."
    • 3.1 "Food is inedible."
      1.9 "81% did not enjoy the desserts."
      1.3 "87% did not like what was on the menu."
      3.8 "62% found the side dishes unedible."
      2.5 "For 75%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.1 "69% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.7 "73% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.7 "Awful breakfast."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.1 "For 79%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.9 "91% didn't like the architecture."
      1.4 "86% complained about the elevator."
      1.4 "86% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 2.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.7 "83% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    based on 936 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
      7.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 79%."
    • 9.3 "World class service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.9 "89% said the reception staff was great."
      9.5 "95% thought the service was very professional."
      7.4 "Housekeeping was great, according to 74%."
    • 3.3 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.6 "For 94%, the rooms looked old."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% found problems with the furniture."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
      3.2 "68% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.7 "Food is inedible."
      1.7 "83% did not enjoy the desserts."
      1.4 "86% did not like what was on the menu."
      2.8 "For 72%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
      3.8 "62% found the side dishes unedible."
    • 2.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.7 "83% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.0 "80% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.6 "94% didn't like the architecture."
      1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."
      2.2 "For 78%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    based on 91 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.2 "World class service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.9 "89% said the reception staff was great."
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 5.1 "Average cleanliness."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 2.4 "Awful breakfast."
    • 1.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.5 "85% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.3 "Horrible vibe."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    based on 273 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 9.0 "Excellent value."
    • 8.8 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.3 "83% said the reception staff was great."
      7.2 "Housekeeping was great, according to 72%."
      9.6 "96% thought the service was very professional."
    • 3.3 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.2 "Awful breakfast."
    • 2.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.3 "77% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.7 "83% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Great reception"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map