Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Kyoto Garden Hotel

351 Enpukujicho, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto 604-8175, Japan
+81 752 552 000

€54+

Overall guest ratings

7.4/10 Good
based on 741 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 8.2
  • 5.2
  • 4.6

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Kyoto Garden Hotel, you'll be just a 5-minute drive from Nijo Castle and Kyoto Imperial Palace. For a bite to eat, guests can check out Saien, which serves breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Rooms offer up nice touches like slippers and comfy beds with down comforters.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Parking
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Laundry service
    • Tennis
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Laundry facilities
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 741 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.4 "84% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.2 "Easily accessible by car, said 82%."
      8.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 84%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% said the reception staff was great."
      9.0 "90% thought the service was very professional."
      8.0 "Housekeeping was great, according to 80%."
    • 8.1 "Good value."
    • 8.0 "Very good internet connection."
      7.6 "76% said the wifi quality was great."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
      6.7 "For 67%, maintenance was acceptable."
    • 4.6 "Bad amenities."
      4.1 "59% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.6 "94% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
    • 3.8 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 333 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      7.0 "Great parking, according to 70%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.5 "85% thought parking was inexpensive."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 88%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      8.0 "80% said the reception staff was great."
      9.2 "92% thought the service was very professional."
      8.3 "Housekeeping was great, according to 83%."
    • 6.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Bad amenities."
      3.9 "61% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were small."
      0.7 "93% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.7 "53% thought it was too noisy."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 74 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.9 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.5 "95% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.7 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "95% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 81 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to shopping."
      7.1 "Great parking, according to 71%."
      8.6 "86% thought parking was inexpensive."
    • 8.4 "Good value."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.0 "Housekeeping was great, according to 80%."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.7 "63% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.6 "94% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.0 "90% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    based on 251 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.6 "86% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.5 "Good value."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.0 "Housekeeping was great, according to 80%."
      7.8 "78% said the reception staff was great."
      9.1 "91% thought the service was very professional."
    • 7.9 "Internet works."
      7.5 "75% said the wifi quality was great."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.0 "Rooms are ok."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
    • 4.3 "Bad amenities."
      4.2 "58% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    Photos
    Map

    Map