Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Residencial Dandy

Rua Filipe Alistao, 8000-343 Faro, Faro, Portugal
+351 289 824 791

€17+

Overall guest ratings

6.6/10 Good
based on 1,320 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.0
  • 4.6
  • 4.3
  • 4.0

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Ideally situated in Faro’s historic city centre, just a 5-minute walk from the marina, this traditional guest house offers rooms with free Wi-Fi. Facilities include a 24-hour reception. The rooms at Residencial Dandy are decorated in a rustic classical style. Some rooms have shared bathroom facilities, while other rooms have an en suite bathroom. Many restaurants and bars are within walking distance of Residencial Dandy. The guest house has a shared kitchen with a microwave and a kettle, as well as a vending machine. The 24-hour available staff can arrange a rental car or rental bicycle for guests who want to explore their surroundings. The guest house also features laundry facilities, a library, and a public computer with free Wi-Fi. The Faro Train Station is only 1,805 feet from Residencial Dandy, and the Cathedral of Faro is 2,133 feet away.

    Less More
    booking.com

    AMENITIES

    • Internet
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Free parking
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 1,261 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.1 "City centre within easy reach, said 91%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.8 "88% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      9.0 "90% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.3 "83% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 5.0 "Service is ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.6 "Not very clean."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.1 "59% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.3 "87% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.0 "100% complained about the elevator."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.9 "91% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the balcony."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 680 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.5 "85% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 5.2 "Service is ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      4.8 "52% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.1 "59% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.4 "86% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "69% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
    • 2.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.1 "79% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 100 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
    • 8.1 "Good value."
    • 5.2 "Service is ok."
      6.3 "Only 63% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.1 "Average cleanliness."
    • 4.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.8 "62% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 479 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 89%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.0 "Average cleanliness."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.9 "Service is below average."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the management."
      3.1 "69% thought the service was unprofessional."
      3.9 "61% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 4.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
    • 3.9 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close