Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Eden am Zoo

Uhlandstraße 184, 10623 Berlin, Berlin, Germany
+49 30 881 5900

€37+

Overall guest ratings

6.7/10 Good
based on 1,044 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 7.7
  • 3.3
  • 3.3

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The hotel-pension EDEN AM ZOO is located in the center of Western Berlin, near the main street Kurfuerstendamm and between ZOO station and International Exhibition Center. Your day here starts with a hearty continental breakfast, after which you will be able to enjoy that special mood of the German capital. Make a few steps and you are on Kurfuerstendamm with its many shopping centers, boutiques, cafes, and restaurants with German or International cuisine. Historic and cultural sights are also close by and are easily accessible by public transportation. Nightlife lovers will find plenty of theaters, movie theaters, bars, and night clubs. We speak German, English, and Russian, and will be happy to assist you in organization of your stay in Berlin.

    Less show all
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Parking
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Internet
    • Express check out
    • Storage available
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 1,044 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 88%."
      8.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 88%."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.1 "Management was excellent, said 71%."
    • 5.9 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were small."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.9 "81% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.9 "61% complained about the elevator."
      1.5 "For 85%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.0 "60% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.3 "87% had problems with the shower."
      2.9 "71% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.6 "74% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.0 "70% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.5 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.3 "77% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 261 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.1 "79% thought it was too noisy."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were small."
      1.3 "87% had problems with the shower."
      2.9 "71% found problems with the furniture."
      3.2 "68% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 459 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.7 "Not very comfortable."
      1.4 "86% thought it was too noisy."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.6 "74% found problems with the furniture."
      1.1 "89% had problems with the shower."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      3.0 "70% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.9 "61% complained about the elevator."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.4 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 323 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.8 "62% complained about the elevator."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "86% had problems with the shower."
      2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      2.0 "80% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map