Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Shan-yue Hotspring Hotel

No.17 Cyuanyuan Road Beitou District, Taipei 112, Taiwan
+886 228 913 388

€64+

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
based on 1,683 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.5
  • 8.2
  • 4.8
  • 4.5

Good to know

  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Beitou, this hotel is within 1 mi (2 km) of Plum Garden and Beitou Hot Springs Park. Taipei National University of the Arts is 2.6 mi (4.2 km) away.

    Less More
    Expedia

    AMENITIES

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Sauna
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Concierge service
    • Express check out
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    • Free parking
    • Steam room
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 1,683 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 8.2 "Very nice wellness & sports facilities."
      8.6 "86% loved the sauna."
    • 6.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.2 "Average value."
    • 4.8 "Disappointing food."
    • 4.5 "Service is below average."
      3.3 "67% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.3 "Bad housekeeping, according to 77%."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "97% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      2.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 75%."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.5 "Not very clean."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.9 "71% said that wellness & sports facilities were unclean."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 959 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.3 "Very nice wellness & sports facilities."
    • 6.5 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.2 "Average value."
    • 4.4 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.5 "Service is below average."
      3.1 "69% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.3 "Bad housekeeping, according to 77%."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "97% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 521 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
    • 8.0 "Very nice wellness & sports facilities."
    • 6.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.9 "Average value."
    • 5.1 "Food is average."
    • 4.7 "Service is below average."
      3.7 "63% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.2 "Bad housekeeping, according to 78%."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 201 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
    • 8.2 "Very nice wellness & sports facilities."
    • 6.5 "Average value."
    • 6.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Service is ok."
      6.6 "Only 66% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close