Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

City Central De Luxe

Sokolska 21, 120 00 Prague, Prague Region, Czech Republic
+420 242 430 003

€46+

Overall guest ratings

7.4/10 Good
based on 3,389 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.9
  • 6.7
  • 4.2
  • 4.0

Good to know

  • Near city centre

Nearby

    show all

    AMENITIES

    • Internet
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Gift shop
    • No smoking
    • Parking
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 3,389 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      7.7 "77% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 6.7 "Average value."
      5.5 "55% thought it was adequately priced."
    • 5.7 "Service is ok."
      5.8 "Only 58% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.0 "50% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
    • 5.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."
      3.2 "68% found problems with the furniture."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.9 "61% had problems with the shower."
      4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.9 "71% were disappointed with the minibar."
      1.4 "86% were unhappy with the view."
      3.6 "64% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      4.1 "59% thought it was too noisy."
      4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.0 "Disappointing food."
      3.5 "65% did not enjoy the desserts."
      4.6 "54% did not like the vegetable dishes."
      2.9 "For 71%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.5 "For 65%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 2,067 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
      9.1 "91% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.4 "Average value."
      5.2 "52% thought it was adequately priced."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.2 "52% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.5 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 55%."
    • 5.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were small."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      4.4 "56% thought it was too noisy."
      4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were small."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "For 82%, the rooms looked old."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."
      4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.9 "71% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 4.2 "Disappointing food."
      3.6 "64% did not enjoy the desserts."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 576 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
    • 6.6 "Average value."
      5.4 "54% thought it was adequately priced."
    • 5.8 "Service is ok."
      5.8 "Only 58% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.2 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.9 "Internet is poor."
      2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      5.0 "For only 50%, the bathroom was ok."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were small."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "For 79%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were small."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.8 "82% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    based on 745 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
    • 7.0 "High value."
      5.5 "55% thought it was adequately priced."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
    • 5.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were small."
      4.9 "51% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."
      1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
    • 4.3 "Disappointing food."
    • 4.1 "Not very comfortable."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."
      3.9 "61% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Good to know
    "Near city centre"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map