Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Hk Downtown Backpackers

Block A, 3rd Floor, Flat A2, Chung King Mansions, 36-44 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
+852 2366 7468

€12+

Overall guest ratings

4.4/10 OK
based on 1,111 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 6.6
  • 2.7
  • 2.3

Nearby

    show all

    About

    HK Downtown Backpackers is located in the Tsim Sha Tsui area, within a 1-minute walk of MTR East Tsim Sha Tsui Station, Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station and the airport bus stop. It offers simple and affordable accommodation with free Wi-Fi access. Air-conditioned guest rooms are fitted with a work desk and cable television. The en suite bathroom comes with shower facilities. The staff at the tour desk can assist with making travel arrangements. Safety deposit facilities are available at the 24-hour front desk. Backpackers HK Downtown is within a 5-minute walk of the Victoria Harbour, the Cultural Centre and the popular Avenue of Stars. Kowloon Park and the SOGO Shopping Centre Tsim Sha Tsui are both a 3-minute walk away.

    Less More
    booking.com

    AMENITIES

    • ATM on-site
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • No smoking
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    4.3 OK
    based on 1,106 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.6 "86% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
    • 6.6 "Internet is average."
      5.8 "58% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 6.1 "Average value."
    • 5.6 "Food is average."
    • 2.7 "Service is unsatisfactory."
      2.2 "78% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      2.8 "72% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the management."
      4.1 "59% thought the service was unprofessional."
      4.0 "Bad housekeeping, according to 60%."
    • 2.3 "Awful breakfast."
    • 2.2 "Awful rooms."
      1.8 "82% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.8 "62% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.0 "For 90%, the rooms looked old."
      3.8 "62% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 1.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.8 "82% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.7 "93% said rooms were small."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 1.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.6 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 94%."
      1.0 "For 90%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    4.3 OK
    based on 232 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 6.6 "Internet is average."
    • 6.1 "Average value."
    • 2.7 "Service is unsatisfactory."
      2.4 "76% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      2.4 "76% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.0 "80% didn't like the management."
    • 2.4 "Awful rooms."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "61% had problems with the shower."
    • 1.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% thought it was too noisy."
    • 1.5 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 0.8 "Generally quite dirty."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% thought it was rather dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    4.4 OK
    based on 221 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.4 "Average value."
    • 2.6 "Service is unsatisfactory."
      1.8 "82% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      3.0 "70% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      1.4 "86% didn't like the management."
    • 2.1 "Awful rooms."
      2.0 "80% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
    • 1.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.0 "80% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 83%."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 0.8 "Generally quite dirty."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    4.5 OK
    based on 652 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.9 "89% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
    • 6.7 "Internet is average."
      6.1 "61% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 6.5 "Average value."
    • 3.1 "Service is unsatisfactory."
      2.6 "74% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      2.8 "72% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.8 "62% thought the service was unprofessional."
      1.8 "82% didn't like the management."
      4.5 "Bad housekeeping, according to 55%."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.9 "Awful rooms."
      1.4 "86% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      3.5 "65% had problems with the shower."
      0.9 "91% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.8 "For 92%, the rooms looked old."
    • 1.4 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.4 "86% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.6 "94% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      4.2 "58% thought it was too noisy."
    • 1.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 95%."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close