Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Residencial Bela Star

Rua da Alegria, 642, 4000-037 Porto, Porto, Portugal
+351 225 107 168

€18+

Overall guest ratings

6.7/10 Good
based on 1,216 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 8.5
  • 3.0
  • 3.0

Good to know

  • Accessible parking
  • Affordable parking

Nearby

    show all

    About

    At Residencial Bela Star, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Porto Cathedral and Casa da Musica. Guests will have free perks like WiFi and self parking. Also, Sandeman Cellars and Museum of Port Wine are within a short drive.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Free parking
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 1,216 reviews
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
    • 7.9 "Good service."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
    • 2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 863 reviews
    • 9.3 "Excellent value."
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      8.9 "Great parking, according to 89%."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
      7.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 79%."
      9.1 "Near to public transport, according to 91%."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.2 "72% said the reception staff was great."
      10.0 "Management was excellent, said 100%."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.2 "88% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      0.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 91%."
    • 2.4 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.3 "For 77%, the rooms looked old."
      3.7 "63% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
      0.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 91%."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 85 reviews
    • 9.3 "Excellent value."
    • 8.3 "Location is great."
      8.9 "Great parking, according to 89%."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
    • 2.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "For 77%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 267 reviews
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      8.6 "Near to public transport, according to 86%."
      7.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 76%."
      8.8 "Great parking, according to 88%."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      3.6 "64% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      1.2 "88% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.6 "64% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.6 "64% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.4 "Horrible vibe."
      2.0 "80% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Accessible parking"
    "Affordable parking"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close