Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Residencial Bela Star

Rua da Alegria, 642, 4000-037 Porto, Porto, Portugal
+351 225 107 168

€19+

Overall guest ratings

6.6/10 Good
based on 1,245 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 8.2
  • 4.2
  • 3.4

Good to know

  • Accessible parking
  • Affordable parking

Nearby

    show all

    About

    At Residencial Bela Star, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Porto Cathedral and Casa da Musica. Guests will have free perks like WiFi and self parking. Also, Sandeman Cellars and Museum of Port Wine are within a short drive.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Free parking
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 1,245 reviews
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
      7.1 "71% thought it was a great value."
    • 8.2 "Location is great."
      8.2 "Great parking, according to 82%."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
      8.4 "Near to public transport, according to 84%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
      6.9 "69% thought the management was tolerable."
    • 4.2 "Not very clean."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Awful breakfast."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      2.8 "72% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.1 "89% found problems with the furniture."
      4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."
      1.0 "90% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.0 "60% were unhappy with the view."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 908 reviews
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
      8.4 "Great parking, according to 84%."
      7.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 74%."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
      8.7 "Near to public transport, according to 87%."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.3 "73% said the reception staff was great."
      7.2 "Management was excellent, said 72%."
    • 4.3 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.9 "91% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.4 "For 86%, the rooms looked old."
      3.5 "65% had problems with the shower."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 67%."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.8 "82% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% thought it was too noisy."
      3.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 67%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 74 reviews
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      8.3 "Great parking, according to 83%."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.6 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 1.9 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 261 reviews
    • 8.8 "Good value."
    • 8.2 "Location is great."
      7.1 "City centre within easy reach, said 71%."
      8.3 "Great parking, according to 83%."
      8.4 "Near to public transport, according to 84%."
    • 6.6 "Service is ok."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      2.7 "73% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "73% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.2 "78% said rooms were small."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.0 "70% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories
    Good to know
    "Accessible parking"
    "Affordable parking"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map