Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Hotel Diamond

Nishinari-ku Taishi 1-13-21, Osaka 557-0002, Japan
+81 666 314 890

€9+

Overall guest ratings

6.3/10 Good
based on 2,269 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 9.1
  • 3.8
  • 3.5

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Nishinari, this hotel is within a 10-minute walk of Spa World and Tsutenkaku Tower. Shitennoji Temple and Shinsaibashi Shopping Arcade are also within 3 mi (5 km).

    Less More
    Expedia

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Bicycle hire
    • Air-conditioned
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Express check out
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    based on 2,269 reviews
    • 9.4 "Excellent value."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the price."
      8.7 "87% thought it was a great value."
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.5 "85% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.2 "Internet is average."
    • 3.8 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.6 "74% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      4.0 "60% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 62%."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.6 "64% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.3 "For 67%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.6 "74% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.1 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 59%."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 62%."
      3.7 "63% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      0.9 "91% thought it was rather dirty."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.0 OK
    based on 612 reviews
    • 9.5 "Excellent value."
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.5 "85% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.4 "Internet is average."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.9 "61% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 61%."
      1.3 "87% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.4 "For 66%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "For 60%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.7 "73% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.8 "72% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.0 "For 60%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
      3.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 61%."
    • 2.4 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% thought it was rather dirty."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 204 reviews
    • 9.4 "Excellent value."
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.8 "Internet is poor."
      4.4 "56% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.0 "60% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.3 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    based on 22 reviews
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 1,429 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 9.3 "Excellent value."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the price."
      8.6 "86% thought it was a great value."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.5 "85% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.1 "Internet is average."
    • 4.1 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.3 "77% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.3 "For 57%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      4.1 "59% complained about the bathroom."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 62%."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.2 "68% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.0 "For 70%, the rooms looked old."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.3 "For 57%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      4.7 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 53%."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 62%."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.2 "88% thought it was rather dirty."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map