Overview

Our website uses cookies for technical, analytical and marketing purposes. Here is more information. If you agree to this, just keep browsing. close

Insurance

No.69, Changjiang Road, Xuanwu Area, Nanjing 210005, China
+86 258 471 5888

€33+

Overall guest ratings

8.3/10 Excellent
based on 1,664 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 8.4
  • 5.4
  • 4.2

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car
  • Great shopping

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The Insurance Mansion (Baoxian Dasha) is located only 0.7 km from the bustling city center close to Nanjing popular sights like the Confucius Temple and Presidential Palace as well as many shopping centers. Diners may enjoy food at the on-site Chinese restaurant one of private dining rooms or the cafeteria. This Nanjing hotel has variously-sized meeting rooms the larger of which can accommodate 250-300. During their spare time guests may get pampered at the beauty salon play tennis or exercise body at the gym. Those looking to socialize may head to the café.

    Less show all
    CtripApac
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    8.3 Excellent
    based on 1,664 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.4 "Food is delicious."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 7.1 "Good cleanliness."
      7.1 "71% said rooms were clean."
      8.0 "80% thought it was clean."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      6.0 "Only 60% thought the service was professional."
      6.1 "Only 61% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 87%."
      1.9 "81% had problems with the shower."
      4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.6 "84% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "100% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.6 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.0 "80% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.7 Excellent
    based on 249 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.1 "Service is ok."
    • 5.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    8.4 Excellent
    based on 599 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 8.5 "Food is delicious."
    • 7.7 "High value."
    • 7.0 "Good cleanliness."
      7.1 "71% said rooms were clean."
      7.7 "77% thought it was clean."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      5.0 "50% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.8 "Only 58% thought the service was professional."
      6.1 "Only 61% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
      4.2 "58% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
    • 2.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.5 "75% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.7 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.0 Good
    based on 698 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.4 "Good value."
    • 6.9 "Average cleanliness."
      6.8 "Only 68% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.0 "Service is ok."
      4.2 "58% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 84%."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.9 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.9 "Terrible amenities."
      1.9 "81% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.4 Excellent
    based on 116 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
    • 8.4 "Good value."
    • 5.9 "Service is ok."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.7 "Terrible amenities."
      1.7 "83% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    "Great shopping"
    data provided by TrustYou
    Map

    Map